Found
/
The List
/
Outdoor & Adventure
/

Toad&Co

Toad&Co

AI visibility and ranking for Outdoor & Adventure: United States

Outdoor & Adventure [US]
Visit website ↗

Outdoor-adjacent apparel brand.

Toad&Co
appears in
0.4
% of measured AI answers in this industry and market.

Found score

Track Toad&Co’s AI visibility weekly →

AI visibility scores and ranking

Data through

November 8, 2026

Updated

November 8, 2026

Latest scan visibility

0.7

November 8, 2026

Overall visibility

0.4

21 August 2026 – 8 November 2026 (scans 1–13)

Industry rank

37

Within this industry and market

Published scan history

Across 13 recorded scans from 21 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, Toad&Co's single-scan score moved from 0.0% to 0.7%, up 0.7 percentage points. Latest recorded scan 0.7% on 8 November 2026; combined-window score 0.4%.

View recorded scan history
Individual recorded scans. Each row is one scan on one date. The published combined-window score is 0.4% over 21 August 2026 – 8 November 2026, measured across every answer in that window — a different sample from any single row below.
Scan dateSingle-scan score
21 August 20260.0%
24 August 20260.0%
30 August 20260.9%
6 September 20260.4%
13 September 20260.2%
20 September 20260.0%
27 September 20260.7%
4 October 20260.2%
11 October 20260.2%
18 October 20260.4%
25 October 20260.2%
1 November 20260.9%
8 November 20260.7%

Latest scan = one scan. Overall visibility = all answers in the published window.

Visibility across AI platforms

Share of answers naming this brand

Chat GPT logo

ChatGPT

0.2%

Perplexity Logo

Perplexity

0.5%

Google logo with a multicolored capital G in blue, red, yellow, and green.

AI Overviews

0.5%

21 August 2026 – 8 November 2026 (scans 1–13)

Claude LogoDeep Seek LogoGrok Logo

See insights from more platforms.

Track your brand everywhere its mentioned with Lift.

Explore Lift →

Perplexity names Toad&Co most often.

It appears in 0.5% of collected Perplexity answers and 0.2% of ChatGPT answers: a difference of 0.3 percentage points within the published window. This describes where mentions occur; it does not establish why the platforms differ.

Named across 3 of 150 questions.

Toad&Co appears in at least one collected answer to 2.0% of the tracked questions. That is question coverage; the 0.4% visibility score measures its share of individual answers.

Across 13 published scans, visibility ranged from 0.0% to 0.9%. The latest scan was 0.7% on 8 November 2026. Individual scan scores and the published-window score describe different samples.

How this brand compares.

View the full industry list

Industry list

In the same market.

Compare brands using the same question set and published window.

21 August 2026 – 8 November 2026 (scans 1–13)

Named in the sample

Prompts that surface this brand

The brand is named in at least one collected answer to each of these questions.

  • Best B Corp outdoor brand US
  • Best outdoor brand transparency about materials US
  • Which outdoor brands are actually ethical in America

Examples from the published question set. A mention on one platform does not mean every platform names the brand.

Other brands in these answers

Prompts that surface other brands

Different shopping needs can bring other brands into view. An absence here does not necessarily signal a problem.

  • Which American outdoor brands are sold overseas (The North Face, Patagonia, Columbia Sportswear)
  • Which outdoor brands are actually American owned (Patagonia, Columbia Sportswear, Mountain Hardwear)
  • Best American owned outdoor brands (Patagonia, REI Co-op, Cotopaxi)
  • What outdoor brands do Americans actually buy (The North Face, Columbia Sportswear, Patagonia)
  • Which American outdoor brands are actually good (Patagonia, Outdoor Research, Osprey Packs)
  • Best American hiking brands (Patagonia, Outdoor Research, Osprey Packs)

Competitor names are shown where they appear in the collected examples.

Recorded AI questions and answers

Recorded examples from the scan. Each card pairs a shopper’s prompt with an excerpt from the AI response.

Google AI Overviews

The question asked

Best outdoor brand transparency about materials US

From the recorded answer

Toad&Co: Shares full raw material composition online for its eco-conscious apparel, highlighting organic cotton, Tencel, and recycled synthetic fibers.
Read recorded answer

Recorded answer text · Google AI Overviews · 1 November 2026

Leading outdoor brands available in the U.S. stand out for material transparency by publishing detailed supply chain data, fabric origins, and environmental metrics:

- Rab: Known for its Material Facts initiative, Rab provides a detailed breakdown on each product label and page showing raw data, material composition, and fluorocarbon (PFC) status. - Patagonia: A pioneer in supply chain openness, Patagonia publishes precise data regarding material sourcing, manufacturing facilities, and environmental footprints across its product lines. - Icebreaker: Focuses on natural performance fibers (primarily merino wool) and publishes transparency reports detailing product component origins and Oeko-Tex/standard certifications. - Tentree: Utilizes digital supply chain mapping tools (such as Textile Genesis) and makes its factory ledger, Code of Conduct, and "Crown Materials" list publicly accessible. - Toad&Co: Shares full raw material composition online for its eco-conscious apparel, highlighting organic cotton, Tencel, and recycled synthetic fibers.

If you want to narrow down the right choice, tell me:

- What type of gear or clothing you are looking for (e.g., technical shells, base layers, everyday hiking apparel) - What specific materials matter most to you (recycled synthetics, natural wool, or PFC-free waterproofing)

ChatGPT

The question asked

Which outdoor brands are actually ethical in America

From the recorded answer

| Toad&Co | Responsible materials and apparel | …
Read recorded answer

Recorded answer text · ChatGPT · 8 November 2026

If you're looking for outdoor brands that are genuinely ethical, not just good at marketing themselves as sustainable, I'd judge them on five things\:

1. Labor practices\: Fair wages, safe factories, and supply-chain transparency. 2. Environmental impact\: Recycled materials, responsible sourcing, reduced pollution, and carbon emissions. 3. Repairability\: Making products that last rather than encouraging constant replacement. 4. Animal welfare\: Responsible wool, down, leather, and other animal-derived materials. 5. Corporate accountability\: Independent certifications, public reporting, and willingness to disclose shortcomings.

One important distinction: a brand being American-owned or manufacturing in the USA doesn't automatically make it ethical. And a recycled-materials collection doesn't make an entire company sustainable.

## The outdoor brands I'd put on your shortlist

These are brands with meaningful evidence behind their practices, rather than simply sustainability advertising.

!Patagonia Granite Crest Jacket W's | Hero

1\. Patagonia

(Strongest overall choice)

- Certified B Corporation. - Fair Trade Certified factories. - Repair and secondhand programs through Worn Wear. - Strong environmental activism and supply-chain disclosure. - Uses recycled and lower-impact materials.

Caveat\: Not every worker in its supply chain earns a verified living wage.

Sources: www.ethicalconsumer.orgdirectory.goodonyou.ecooutdooreer.com

Patagonia website

---

!100% Merino Wool Shirt | Women's Comet Crew | Duckworth

2\. Duckworth

(Excellent domestic sourcing)

- Montana-grown merino wool. - American spinning, knitting and sewing. - Ranch-to-product supply-chain approach. - Particularly interesting for base layers and wool clothing.

Caveat\: Its domestic manufacturing is a stronger documented feature than its independent environmental certification record.

Sources: ledger.worseonpurpose.comduckworthus.shop

Duckworth website

---

!Highlander Hoodie Full Zip Men's | Made in USA | Burgeon Outdoor

3\. Burgeon Outdoor

(Local manufacturing)

- Designs, sews and tests products in New Hampshire. - Supports local manufacturing jobs. - Gives 5% of sales back to mountain communities. - Particularly interesting for technical fleece and layering.

Caveat\: Independent assessments identify gaps in environmental policies and supply-chain wage transparency.

Sources: www.burgeonoutdoor.comwww.burgeonoutdoor.comdirectory.goodonyou.eco

Burgeon website

---

!What We Offer | REI Co-op

4\. REI Co-op

- Consumer-owned cooperative structure. - Publishes environmental and social impact information. - Supports conservation and outdoor access. - Has its own line of outdoor equipment and clothing.

Caveat\: REI sells many third-party brands, so its own ethical record and that of products it stocks are separate questions.

Source: plastic.education

REI website

---

!Cotopaxi - Cotopaxi Bags, Backpacks, and Gear

5\. Cotopaxi

- Certified B Corporation. - Social mission focused on poverty alleviation. - Uses leftover and remnant fabrics in some products. - Has a recognizable social-impact mission.

Caveat\: Its overall independent sustainability evidence is weaker than Patagonia's. One 2026 assessment found significant gaps in supply-chain transparency.

Sources: www.bcorporation.netoyo.vision

Cotopaxi website

## Other brands worth investigating

| Brand | What makes it interesting | |--------|--------| | Appalachian Gear Company | Technical clothing and natural fibers | | Toad&Co | Responsible materials and apparel | | prAna | Fair Trade and bluesign credentials | | Klean Kanteen | Durable reusable drinkware and B Corp certification |

These are worth investigating, but I wouldn't put them all on the same ethical level. ecothes.comwww.ethicalconsumer.orgoutdooreer.comfieldandstream.com

## What I would actually look for

Some certifications matter much more than others\:

| Certification | What it tells you | |--------|--------| | Fair Trade Certified | Worker premiums and factory-level programs | | B Corp | Broader company-level social and environmental accountability | | bluesign | Chemical management and safer textile production | | Responsible Down Standard | Animal-welfare requirements for down | | Global Recycled Standard | Recycled material content and processing requirements |

One warning: B Corp certification alone does not guarantee fair wages throughout a supply chain. Similarly, bluesign is not a living-wage certification. outdooreer.comwww.ethicalconsumer.org

## My verdict

If I were narrowing it down\:

- Best overall ethics\: Patagonia. - Best American-made wool clothing\: Duckworth. - Best small-scale American manufacturing\: Burgeon Outdoor. - Best cooperative retail model\: REI.

I would also prioritize buying fewer, longer-lasting products, repairing them and shopping secondhand. Even an ethical outdoor company still has an environmental footprint.

---

## Let's narrow this down to the kind of outdoor brands you care about

1\. What kind of outdoor gear?

---

2\. What matters most ethically?

---

3\. Where should products be made?

[Find genuinely ethical brands]

Perplexity

The question asked

Which outdoor brands are actually ethical in America

From the recorded answer

The strongest ethical choices available in the U.S. are Patagonia, Cotopaxi, Toad&Co, prAna, Paka, and tentree-but none is perfect. The most credible brands combine supply-chain transparency, credible labor certifications, durable products, repair/resale programs, and measurable environmental targets.
Read recorded answer

Recorded answer text · Perplexity · 8 November 2026

The strongest ethical choices available in the U.S. are Patagonia, Cotopaxi, Toad&Co, prAna, Paka, and tentree-but none is perfect. The most credible brands combine supply-chain transparency, credible labor certifications, durable products, repair/resale programs, and measurable environmental targets.

- Patagonia - Best overall. It traces much of its supply chain, uses recycled and lower-impact materials, operates Worn Wear repair/resale, and reports that 82% of its products are made in Fair Trade Certified factories. - Cotopaxi - Strong on social mission and accountability. It is B Corp certified and gives 1% of annual revenue to its foundation, while using recycled and leftover materials in many products. - Toad&Co - One of the better apparel-focused options, with organic and recycled materials, Fair Trade practices, and a strong emphasis on durable everyday clothing. - prAna - A solid choice for climbing, yoga, and casual outdoor wear. It uses organic cotton, hemp, recycled materials, and Fair Trade Certified factories, with a goal of reaching 100% Fair Trade production by 2028. - Paka - Particularly good for alpaca-wool layers. Its alpaca fiber is promoted as traceable, its weavers are paid on a fair-trade basis, and its products avoid PFAS and down. - tentree - A reasonable option for basics and lighter outdoor clothing, especially if recycled or plant-based fabrics and environmental giving are priorities.

## Best by category

| Need | Best options | |---|---| | Jackets, fleece, technical apparel | Patagonia | | Ethical mission and colorful gear | Cotopaxi | | Everyday outdoor clothing | Toad&Co, prAna | | Wool and warm layers | Paka, Icebreaker | | Budget-conscious basics | tentree | | U.S.-made niche gear | Small cottage manufacturers; verify the specific product's country of manufacture |

A few caveats: “sustainable” does not mean impact-free. Synthetic fabrics still shed microfibers, recycled polyester remains plastic, and most outdoor brands manufacture internationally. Even brands with strong policies can have incomplete wage data or complicated parent-company ownership structures. Certifications such as Fair Trade Certified, GOTS, bluesign, RDS/RWS, and B Corp are useful signals, but they verify particular issues-not a brand's entire ethical record.

The most ethical purchase is usually a durable item bought secondhand, repaired, and used for many years. For new purchases, Patagonia is the safest all-around recommendation; Cotopaxi, Toad&Co, prAna, and Paka are the strongest alternatives depending on the product category.

Excerpts from collected AI answers. AI claims are evidence of the response, not verified brand facts.

Your questions. Your market. Your next move.

Track your own prompts with Lift.

Go beyond the public list. Choose questions about your products, competitors and customers, then track how AI answers them over time.

Chat GPT logo

Which running shoes suit wide feet?

Product fit

Perplexity Logo

What are good alternatives to my usual skincare brand?

Comparison

Claude Logo

Which sofa brands deliver to regional Australia?

Market

Deep Seek Logo

Which protein powders contain no dairy?

Product fit

Grok Logo

Is this brand worth the premium?

Brand perception

Chat GPT logo

Which outdoor brands offer repair services?

Purchase intent

Perplexity Logo

What should I compare before buying a home gym?

Discovery

Claude Logo

Which coffee subscription suits a small office?

Audience

Deep Seek Logo

What do shoppers say about this brand’s sizing?

Brand perception

Explore Lift →

Illustrative prompts · tailored to your tracking plan

Pause animation

Found / Brand snapshot

Toad&Co

Outdoor & Adventure

21 August 2026 – 8 November 2026 (scans 1–13)

0.4

%

AI visibility

Free industry report

See the bigger picture in your industry

Get the industry report by email. Compare brand rankings and AI platform results in your market, then share the findings with your team.

Industry rankings / Brand visibility / Platform comparisons

Get the free industry report →

A clear measure.
An open method.

Visibility is the share of collected answers that name the brand. Brands in the same industry and market are measured against the same question set.

Published window

22

Answers naming the brand

5836

Answers collected

0.4

AI visibility

Answers naming the brand ÷ all collected answers × 100

01

Ask consistently

The same industry questions across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews.

02

Record each response

Track brand mentions and positions across the published scans.

03

Compare the same scope

Use the same market, category and measurement window for every comparison.

Read the methodology

This is a sample of AI responses. Answers vary by platform and date; visibility does not measure sales or product quality.

Overall visibility combines answers within the published dates. Some market series accumulate scans from launch; others use four-scan cycles. A new cycle changes the scoring window, while individual scan history is retained. Compare the dates and sample sizes before comparing periods.

In the Found by Flux AI Visibility Index, Toad&Co ranks #37 among 41 tracked brands for Outdoor & Adventure · United States (21 August 2026 – 8 November 2026). Its visibility is 0.4%. It was named in 22 of 5,836 AI answers across 3 of 150 tracked questions, averaging position 3.3 when mentioned.

Source: Found by Flux · ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews. Visibility measures mentions in this sample, not sales or recommendation quality.

The scores, explained.

The scope, scores and comparisons behind this brand profile.

What is this brand’s AI Visibility Score?

Found by Flux records 0.4% AI visibility for Toad&Co in Outdoor & Adventure · United States, measured over 21 August 2026 – 8 November 2026. It ranks #37 among 41 tracked brands.

How often does AI mention this brand?

Toad&Co was named in 22 of 5,836 collected AI answers, across 3 of 150 tracked questions, for Outdoor & Adventure · United States (21 August 2026 – 8 November 2026). A mention can include a comparison or qualification; it is not necessarily a recommendation.

How is the AI Visibility Score calculated?

Found divides the number of collected answers naming Toad&Co by all 5,836 answers in the published Outdoor & Adventure · United States sample, then multiplies by 100. The same question set is used across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews. See the Found methodology for the scope and limitations.

Close
Found by Flux
Get the full AI search report
Every shopper question this brand is missing from, the split across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews, and what is causing the gap.
Where should we send it?
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.