Get your industry’s AI rankings every Monday. Track it →
Found
/
The List
/
Furniture
/

Nathan James

Nathan James

AI visibility and ranking for Furniture: United States

Furniture [US]
Visit website ↗

Flat-pack furniture brand at accessible price points with a broad range.

Nathan James
appears in
2.2
% of measured AI answers in this industry and market.

Found score

Track Nathan James’s AI visibility weekly →

AI visibility scores and ranking

Data through

October 4, 2026

Updated

October 4, 2026

Latest scan visibility

3.1

October 4, 2026

Overall visibility

2.2

21 August 2026 – 4 October 2026 (scans 1–8)

Industry rank

14

Within this industry and market

Published scan history

Across 8 recorded scans from 21 August 2026 to 4 October 2026, Nathan James's single-scan score moved from 0.7% to 3.1%, up 2.4 percentage points. Latest recorded scan 3.1% on 4 October 2026; combined-window score 2.2%.

View recorded scan history
Individual recorded scans. Each row is one scan on one date. The published combined-window score is 2.2% over 21 August 2026 – 4 October 2026, measured across every answer in that window — a different sample from any single row below.
Scan dateSingle-scan score
21 August 20260.7%
24 August 20262.2%
30 August 20261.8%
6 September 20262.0%
13 September 20262.2%
20 September 20262.9%
27 September 20262.4%
4 October 20263.1%

Latest scan = one scan. Overall visibility = all answers in the published window.

Visibility across AI platforms

Share of answers naming this brand

Chat GPT logo

ChatGPT

3.2%

Perplexity Logo

Perplexity

1.8%

Google logo with a multicolored capital G in blue, red, yellow, and green.

AI Overviews

1.4%

21 August 2026 – 4 October 2026 (scans 1–8)

Claude LogoDeep Seek LogoGrok Logo

See insights from more platforms.

Track your brand everywhere its mentioned with Lift.

Explore Lift →

ChatGPT names Nathan James most often.

It appears in 3.2% of collected ChatGPT answers and 1.4% of Google AI Overviews answers: a difference of 1.8 percentage points within the published window. This describes where mentions occur; it does not establish why the platforms differ.

Named across 27 of 150 questions.

Nathan James appears in at least one collected answer to 18.0% of the tracked questions. That is question coverage; the 2.2% visibility score measures its share of individual answers.

Across 8 published scans, visibility ranged from 0.7% to 3.1%. The latest scan was 3.1% on 4 October 2026. Individual scan scores and the published-window score describe different samples.

How this brand compares.

View the full industry list

Industry list

In the same market.

Compare brands using the same question set and published window.

21 August 2026 – 4 October 2026 (scans 1–8)

Share of collected answers naming each brand

Named in the sample

Prompts that surface this brand

The brand is named in at least one collected answer to each of these questions.

  • Best Hamptons style furniture US
  • Best affordable furniture brands US
  • Best armchairs US
  • Best bar stools US
  • Best bedhead brands US
  • Best bedside tables US

Examples from the published question set. A mention on one platform does not mean every platform names the brand.

Other brands in these answers

Prompts that surface other brands

Different shopping needs can bring other brands into view. An absence here does not necessarily signal a problem.

  • Best new American furniture brands (Maiden Home, BenchMade Modern, Sabai)
  • Best independent furniture brands US (Maiden Home, Medley, Sabai)
  • Best sofa brands US (Room & Board, Interior Define, Joybird)
  • Best contemporary furniture US (Rove Concepts, Room & Board, Blu Dot)
  • Best American furniture brands (Room & Board, Thos. Moser, Maiden Home)
  • Best furniture brands for first home buyers US (Article, Castlery, Room & Board)

Competitor names are shown where they appear in the collected examples.

Recorded AI questions and answers

Recorded examples from the scan. Each card pairs a shopper’s prompt with an excerpt from the AI response.

Google AI Overviews

The question asked

Best bar stools US

From the recorded answer

Features a smooth 360-degree swivel mechanism, a supportive walnut frame, and supple leather upholstery with a 300 lb weight capacity.Add to list A budget-friendly mid-century option featuring a solid rubberwood frame, cushioned saddle-shaped faux leather seat, and woven backrest details available at Home Depot and Target.[]( …
Read recorded answer

Recorded answer text · Google AI Overviews · 4 October 2026

The Article Sede Leather Swivel Stool is a top-rated choice for US homes, offering a smooth swivel and walnut-and-leather finish.

### Top-Rated Bar Stools Article Sede Leather Swivel Stool

Features a smooth 360-degree swivel mechanism, a supportive walnut frame, and supple leather upholstery with a 300 lb weight capacity.Add to list A budget-friendly mid-century option featuring a solid rubberwood frame, cushioned saddle-shaped faux leather seat, and woven backrest details available at Home Depot and Target.Add to list A simple, highly durable, and affordable backless wood option supporting up to 300 lbs.Add to list A high-end modern pick with a curvy, cushioned seat and customizable fixed or swiveling base designs.Show more

### Sizing and Buying Guide

- Counter Height (24-27 inches): Designed for standard kitchen islands and counters measuring 36 inches tall. - Bar Height (28-33 inches): Built for taller home bar tables measuring 40 to 42 inches tall. - Spacing: Leave roughly 6 to 10 inches of space between each stool for comfortable seating.

If you want to narrow down your choices, tell me:

- Do you need counter-height or bar-height stools? - Do you prefer with a backrest or backless? - What is your style or budget preference?

ChatGPT

The question asked

Best console tables US

From the recorded answer

### Nathan James Virgo Console Table …
Read recorded answer

Recorded answer text · ChatGPT · 4 October 2026

I searched current U.S. options and cross-checked them against a 2026 roundup from Architectural Digest. www.architecturaldigest.com

### Best console tables in the U.S.

### Yamazaki Home Tower Slim Console Table $95.00

### 17 Stories Kendriel Solid Wood Console $276.99

### Nathan James Virgo Console Table $165.99

### Tribesigns 41" 3-Tier Console Table $119.99

### Alcott Hill LUMERA Console Table $229.99

### Wade Logan Brene 48" Console Table $73.99

My picks:

- Best overall/value: 17 Stories Kendriel Solid Wood Console Table - solid wood, only 9.5" deep, and currently about $277. Great balance of looks, size, and price. - Best for a very narrow hallway: Yamazaki Home Tower Slim Console Table - just 7.28" deep and about $95. Excellent if floor space is tight. - Best modern/rustic: Nathan James Virgo Console Table - reclaimed-black-oak look, two-tier design, about $166. - Best inexpensive 3-tier option: Tribesigns 41" 3-Tier Console Table - $120, 4.8/5 from 86 reviews in the current listing. - Best with drawers: Alcott Hill LUMERA Console Table - solid wood, two drawers, 35.4" wide, about $230. - Best budget long console: Wade Logan Brene 48" Console Table - about $74, 48" wide, with 2,600+ reviews.

For a premium designer look, Architectural Digest currently highlights the Design Within Reach Risom ($1,495), Article Tovi ($499), and Rejuvenation Woodson ($1,749). www.architecturaldigest.com

If you tell me your budget (e.g. under $200), preferred style, and maximum width/depth, I can narrow this to the 5 best-looking options for your space.

Perplexity

The question asked

Best mid range furniture brands US

From the recorded answer

Nathan James - Best for affordable smaller furniture such as shelving, consoles, desks, and occasional tables; the brand offers a lifetime guarantee on its products.
Read recorded answer

Recorded answer text · Perplexity · 4 October 2026

For mid-range furniture in the U.S., these brands offer the best balance of design, quality, and price:

- Article - Best overall for modern sofas, dining tables, and case goods; generally straightforward designs and direct-to-consumer pricing. - Castlery - Best for contemporary and mid-century-modern furniture; typically a step above budget retailers in styling and materials. - West Elm - Best for broad selection and modern design, especially bedroom, dining, and occasional furniture; quality can vary by item. - Room & Board - Best for construction quality and long-term use; usually more expensive than other mid-range choices, but many pieces are made in the U.S. - Burrow - Best for modular sofas and apartment-friendly furniture; useful if you need easy delivery, rearrangement, or replacement components. - Joybird - Best for customizable sofas and chairs, with many upholstery and configuration options. - Kardiel - Best for distinctive mid-century-modern pieces; reviewers highlight its real-wool upholstery and relatively accessible pricing. - Crate & Barrel - Best for classic contemporary furniture and reliable dining collections; shop during sales for better value. - Pottery Barn - Best for traditional, transitional, and family-friendly furniture; strong selection of slipcovered and upholstered pieces. - Lulu and Georgia - Best for decorative, trend-forward furniture and accent pieces rather than furnishing an entire home. - Nathan James - Best for affordable smaller furniture such as shelving, consoles, desks, and occasional tables; the brand offers a lifetime guarantee on its products.

### Best picks by need

| Need | Best brands | |---|---| | Best overall value | Article, Castlery | | Best sofa | Room & Board, Article, Burrow | | Best customizable upholstery | Joybird | | Best mid-century modern | Kardiel, Castlery | | Best family-friendly furniture | Crate & Barrel, Pottery Barn | | Best apartment furniture | Burrow, Article | | Best budget-friendly accents | Nathan James, West Elm | | Best quality above typical mid-range | Room & Board |

A practical shortlist would be Article or Castlery for value, Room & Board for durability, West Elm for variety, and Burrow for modular sofas. Mid-range pricing commonly falls around $1,000-$2,500 for larger pieces, though sofas and solid-wood furniture can exceed that range.

Excerpts from collected AI answers. AI claims are evidence of the response, not verified brand facts.

Your questions. Your market. Your next move.

Track your own prompts with Lift.

Go beyond the public list. Choose questions about your products, competitors and customers, then track how AI answers them over time.

Chat GPT logo

Which running shoes suit wide feet?

Product fit

Perplexity Logo

What are good alternatives to my usual skincare brand?

Comparison

Claude Logo

Which sofa brands deliver to regional Australia?

Market

Deep Seek Logo

Which protein powders contain no dairy?

Product fit

Grok Logo

Is this brand worth the premium?

Brand perception

Chat GPT logo

Which outdoor brands offer repair services?

Purchase intent

Perplexity Logo

What should I compare before buying a home gym?

Discovery

Claude Logo

Which coffee subscription suits a small office?

Audience

Deep Seek Logo

What do shoppers say about this brand’s sizing?

Brand perception

Explore Lift →

Illustrative prompts · tailored to your tracking plan

Pause animation

Found / Brand snapshot

Nathan James

Furniture

21 August 2026 – 4 October 2026 (scans 1–8)

2.2

%

AI visibility

Free industry report

See the bigger picture in your industry

Get the industry report by email. Compare brand rankings and AI platform results in your market, then share the findings with your team.

Industry rankings / Brand visibility / Platform comparisons

Get the free industry report →

A clear measure.
An open method.

Visibility is the share of collected answers that name the brand. Brands in the same industry and market are measured against the same question set.

Published window

78

Answers naming the brand

3600

Answers collected

2.2

AI visibility

Answers naming the brand ÷ all collected answers × 100

01

Ask consistently

The same industry questions across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews.

02

Record each response

Track brand mentions and positions across the published scans.

03

Compare the same scope

Use the same market, category and measurement window for every comparison.

Read the methodology

This is a sample of AI responses. Answers vary by platform and date; visibility does not measure sales or product quality.

Overall visibility combines answers within the published dates. Some market series accumulate scans from launch; others use four-scan cycles. A new cycle changes the scoring window, while individual scan history is retained. Compare the dates and sample sizes before comparing periods.

In the Found by Flux AI Visibility Index, Nathan James ranks #14 among 39 tracked brands for Furniture · United States (21 August 2026 – 4 October 2026). Its visibility is 2.2%. It was named in 78 of 3,600 AI answers across 27 of 150 tracked questions, averaging position 1.8 when mentioned.

Source: Found by Flux · ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews. Visibility measures mentions in this sample, not sales or recommendation quality.

The scores, explained.

The scope, scores and comparisons behind this brand profile.

What is this brand’s AI Visibility Score?

Found by Flux records 2.2% AI visibility for Nathan James in Furniture · United States, measured over 21 August 2026 – 4 October 2026. It ranks #14 among 39 tracked brands.

How often does AI mention this brand?

Nathan James was named in 78 of 3,600 collected AI answers, across 27 of 150 tracked questions, for Furniture · United States (21 August 2026 – 4 October 2026). A mention can include a comparison or qualification; it is not necessarily a recommendation.

How is the AI Visibility Score calculated?

Found divides the number of collected answers naming Nathan James by all 3,600 answers in the published Furniture · United States sample, then multiplies by 100. The same question set is used across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews. See the Found methodology for the scope and limitations.

Close
Found by Flux
Get the full AI search report
Every shopper question this brand is missing from, the split across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews, and what is causing the gap.
Where should we send it?
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.